Passing Truth is True

2000-7-20 12:00:00

Saul writes:
I was asking which one of the two was truth because these are so far apart from each other as heaven from earth. IS is the permanent ultimate reality while the fact that Jane was pregnant or that the moon is still in the night sky is just a passing event. Since it is so simple that a child can understand this, why couldn't you tell me the difference between the two thereby to explain how different they are?

JJ
So according to your narrow definition of truth then the moon, the stars and planet earth itself does not exist and even 2+2 does not equal 4. If that is your definition why even talk about truth, for nothing you will be talking about will be true?

Saul
Therefore my friend, you have not shown me a relative truth. Do you want to have another try?

You did not understand what I meant by relative truth. If you read carefully what I wrote, you would not say that I questioned the equation (2+2=4) as it is in the physical plane. Relativity means when you changed the planes, the equation would become moot or irrelevant. Any rational perception would lose its visibility when approaching the eyes of the soul. A truth that is only truth in one dimension, and not in another, is considered by me as relative. No example would help if the concept was not understood.

JJ
Do you have any reason to believe that 2+2 does not equal four in other dimensions? I notice that this equation is still true even when soul contact is made.

I would say that 2+2=4 in all dimensions. I would like to see some evidence to the contrary if you can provide it.

It is easy to say that you are right because of something you claim to perceive in a dimension only you can access, but how about teaching truth that the rest of us can check out and prove for ourselves?

Passing truth is true because it will always exist as a point in time and space, and time and space will always exist in the mind of God.