Esoteric Astrology

2009-1-1 16:16:00

Johann writes:

"Paris Whitney Hilton (born February 17, 1981)

"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Hilton

"Marilyn Monroe (born Norma Jeane Mortenson, June 1, 1926 - August 5, 1962)

"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marilyn_Monroe

"This does not correspond with the journey through the zodiac as Marilyn was a Gemini and Paris is a Aquarius.

"But this seems to be inconsistent.

"What do you say JJ?"

JJ:

First let me add that I said it was within the realm of possibility that these two are the same entity but cannot say for sure at this point. If I were to take the time to do a more complete analysis of their handwriting and charts I could probably be more definite.

There are two astrological pieces of information that DK [Djwhal Khul] gave that could be interpreted as black-and-white, yet, just as in all things, exactness in black-and-white rarely works out -- especially in esoteric science.

First, he said the advanced student incarnates in counterclockwise order through the zodiac and the average person in regular order.

From my limited study I have found this to not be any fixed law, but seems to be true about half the time.

Why isn't it true all the time if this is the way we progress?

There are, I believe, a number of reasons for this:

In each sign the pilgrim has a lesson of some kind he has to learn. Being as dense as we humans are, around half the time the lesson is not learned, but partially so. Therefore, he does not progress to the next sign but to an energy that will assist him in completing his lesson. Since the lesson is partially learned then it is quite possible he can finish it off in another sign and circumstance.
The sun sign is the most powerful agent in astrology, but still only transmits about twenty-five percent of the influence in a chart. It is then quite possible from an esoteric point of view (often held by DK) that a lesson of a sign, such as Aquarius, could be learned in another sign, such as Gemini or Libra, when other factors exert a strong Aquarian influence.
I would assume, as Ruth supposed, that during the Sabbath life the entity would often be born out of sequence, since no major lesson is being undertaken.
We are strongly linked to our groups and opportunities and sometimes this makes it impossible to be born in the next designated sign.
An advanced soul places service above personal progress. If the opportunity for service is there then he may delay the potential progress of moving to his next sign.

The second unusual teaching is that a person is born in one life on the day he died in the previous life.

I have found this to be rarely exactly true but close about half the time. For instance, in my last life my friends Wayne and Curtis were with me. Curtis was killed Aug 8 and was born in this life on Aug 7. This could have been within 24 hours of the same point in time.

Wayne was killed on October 14 and born in this life on October 17. Close again. On the other hand, I was killed 12:30 AM, July 21 and born Feb 6. This was way off the theoretical date. I was probably attracted to be born when I was because of links with my family as well as to take advantage of the Star of David in my chart.

DK never explained why the birth and death signs are so closely linked.

Here are my thoughts:

The art of astrology teaches that the natal chart is significant because at the moment of birth the entity has impressed upon his soul a snapshot of all the energies of the chart in that moment of time and space.

Now the other significant moment in the life of the soul is death. It's quite possible another snapshot of equal power is impressed upon the pilgrim.

If this is so then one of two things would happen:

He would be reborn under similar influences.
If this doesn't fit in with the plan then he would still be influenced by that snapshot of the death date as well as his birthrate and some similarities would be found in the two charts.

I just compared Stauffenberg's death chart with my birth chart and found some interesting things. He was killed when his sun was in 28 degrees Gemini and my sun ascendant was also 28 degrees Gemini.

The ascendant in Stauffenberg's death chart was also in Gemini and that is very significant. Esoterically the ascendant is the second most important point in the chart because it indicates the future lesson in life.

So I was not born in Gemini, the sign of my last death, but my ascending time of my sun in Gemini harmonizes with it down to the exact degree. This makes a lot of sense to me in ways that I do not have time to explain in this post.