2002-10-7 11:59:00
Larry writes:
One of the major problems that several of us are complaining about here is how JJ has replied to us. In the past he has said that if we argue with his views we should argue against what he said, and not what he did not say. We strongly feel that is precisely what he is doing in his replies to us. He is arguing (often at great lengths) against things we have not said.
That is one of the major problems. The other major problem is that JJ does not perceive that he is doing that.
JJ:
You have said several times that I am taking what someone has not said and arguing with it assuming that he did say it. I do not recall doing this or anyone giving me an example of it. It is of course possible I could have misread a post, but could you give me at least two examples since you speak of this in the plural?
By the way, you only commented on one of the four conclusions. I need all who disagree with me to comment on all four (and the ones to come) if we are to reach understanding.
Copyright 2002 by J.J. Dewey, All Rights Reserved